Democrats want to REMOVE Trump’s Secret Service Protection to SEND HIM TO JAIL

Democrats are now trying to remove Trump’s Secret Service protection so they can imprison him.

In this report:

In a move that has ruffled many feathers across the political spectrum, Democrats are reportedly plotting a legislative strategy to remove Donald Trump’s Secret Service protection, ostensibly to facilitate his imprisonment. This controversial plan is led by Bennie Thompson, known for his role on the January 6th committee alongside Liz Cheney. The legislation in question has been cynically dubbed the DISGRACED Act by its proponents, revealing a not-so-subtle nod to its intended target.

The Legislation and Its Implications

The proposed bill, formally known as the Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated Towards Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act, seeks to strip Secret Service protection from any former president convicted of a crime requiring imprisonment. This move, if passed, would amend the U.S. Code to effectively remove security protection upon sentencing for any federal or state offense punishable by a term of imprisonment of at least one year.

The specifics of the bill, as explained by Bennie Thompson, suggest that this legislation is tailored specifically with Trump in mind, leveraging his legal entanglements as a justification for its necessity. Supporters of the bill argue that it is a mere modification of benefits, not a punitive measure, and therefore does not violate constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws or bills of attainder.

Constitutional Concerns and Political Ramifications

Critics of the DISGRACED Act argue that it dangerously skirts the edges of constitutional legality. The Supreme Court, in past rulings, has indicated that the termination of a benefit could raise ex post facto concerns if shown to be punitive in nature. However, proponents of the bill assert that its purpose is not to punish but merely to facilitate the logistics of imprisonment by removing potential conflicts between Secret Service duties and prison security.

This legislative effort raises significant questions about the fairness and motivation behind such targeted measures. It suggests a scenario where political animosity could translate into legal handicaps, potentially setting a troubling precedent for the treatment of political figures post-office.

The Political Strategy Behind the Bill

The introduction of such a bill, particularly by a figure deeply involved in the investigation of Trump’s alleged misconduct, signals a strategic move by Democrats to leverage legal frameworks to their political advantage. By framing the bill as a logistical necessity, they aim to sidestep accusations of partisanship, though the timing and specificity of the bill make such claims suspect.

This act of targeting a former president in such a manner speaks volumes about the current political climate, where legislative actions are increasingly viewed through the lens of partisan warfare rather than principled governance. It underscores a broader strategy of using Congress’s legislative powers to influence legal outcomes, which some may see as a misuse of power.

Public Reaction and Future Prospects

The public reaction to the DISGRACED Act is likely to be polarized, with Trump supporters viewing it as another chapter in the ongoing campaign to undermine him, while opponents may view it as a necessary step to uphold the law. The bill’s progression through Congress will be a litmus test for the Democratic Party’s influence and could have far-reaching implications for how former presidents are treated in the future.

In conclusion, the DISGRACED Act represents more than just a legislative proposal; it is a symbol of the intensely partisan atmosphere that currently dominates American politics. Whether it passes or not, it will undoubtedly have a lasting impact on the political landscape, influencing how political figures are treated after their tenure and possibly altering the very nature of presidential accountability.

Bennie Thompson to REMOVE Trump Secret Service Protection by Robert Gouveia on Scribd