Trump Fights COHEN Testimony; DC Case on LIFE SUPPORT; Fani Prefers BLACK MALES as Judges

Trump’s defense team submitted a massive motion in limine to address the New York criminal trial, aiming to preclude or limit Michael Cohen’s testimony. Meanwhile, Fani Willis’ preferential treatment for black male judges in Atlanta raises concerns about the impartiality of the legal process. The Supreme Court’s decision to hear the immunity issue in Trump’s D.C. case has left his legal battle “on life support.”


 

In this report:

New York Criminal Trial and Michael Cohen’s Testimony

The defense team for Donald Trump has submitted a massive motion in limine to address the upcoming New York criminal trial, targeting the expected testimony of Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer. This motion aims to preclude or limit Cohen’s testimony in the Bragg Prosecution, focusing on the potential impact of his statements on the case. By challenging Cohen’s credibility and the admissibility of his evidence, Trump’s defense is aiming to protect their client from potential harm in this high-stakes legal battle. The outcome of this trial could have significant implications for Trump’s political future and the perception of his presidency.

Preferential Treatment for Black Male Judges in Atlanta

In a revelation that has shocked many, Fani Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney leading the Atlanta election investigation, has implemented an official office policy that prefers “black male” judges over white males and females. This policy raises concerns about the impartiality and fairness of the legal process. Critics argue that such preferential treatment could lead to biased decision-making and undermine the integrity of the justice system. As the Atlanta case continues to unfold, it is crucial to monitor the impact of this policy on the outcome of the investigation.

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Immunity Issue, Trump’s D.C. Case on Life Support

Many in the media have acknowledged that Trump’s D.C. case is now “on life support” after the Supreme Court agreed to hear the immunity issue. This decision could have significant implications for the investigation into the former president’s actions and the potential consequences he may face. With the highest court in the land considering the immunity issue, the Trump legal team is gearing up for a landmark case that could set a precedent for future cases involving sitting presidents. As the nation watches closely, the outcome of this Supreme Court decision will likely have far-reaching consequences for the American political landscape.

Join my Locals community for exclusive content at WatchingTheWatchers.locals.com!


Get my Daily Mind Map and Show Notes

Where should I send them?
 
In case you missed it:

Prefer To Listen?

Check Out the Audio-Only Podcast
Follow Robert on Social Media
Follow Robert on Social Media

Get my Daily Mind Map and Show Notes

Where should I send them?